Myrobalan Shivana (
faithlikeaseed) wrote2017-07-29 06:54 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[IC/OOC] Fade Rift Inbox & Contact
(( Need to get a hold of Myr? Drop him a line. Notes, in-person visits, sending crystals, spooky Fade dream shenanigans, you name it. Just specify the type of contact in the first comment of the thread and away we go.
Need to get a hold of the player? Plagueheart#0051 @ Discord or a DW PM is the easiest! ))
Need to get a hold of the player? Plagueheart#0051 @ Discord or a DW PM is the easiest! ))
no subject
[Were he discussing this with Van, he'd bring in a comparison to the Circles here--but he hasn't the familiarity with Anders to know what might touch off unproductive bickering instead of a worthwhile discussion.
And they've had far too much of that for one lifetime, he thinks.]
Speaking with someone more versed in the law's sensible enough, though. I can't begin to think what might be appropriate for some of these--coercing someone's free will away from her is awful enough to me to warrant a death sentence, though I s'pose it should depend on how much damage the coercion did.
no subject
I realize giving the option to go one's own way will weaken the standing of the group. But freedom and options are of paramount importance. Without them, things absolutely will go downhill.
And I... would not disagree regarding a death sentence for such an act. But the line will have to be set at which doing that earns it because the law attempts to make black and white things that can sometimes be grey. Mind control for personal gain should be punished severely. But what if a blood mage mind controls a slaver to set slaves free?
no subject
[A brief noise that's almost a laugh follows.] That's what the law's for--making things black and white. It's up to righteous judges to bring the gray back in where it's warranted.
What if she does? Did she have other options to free the slaves? Stripping someone of her volition, her Maker-given free will, even if it's only temporary--it's evil. Maybe not evil beyond excuse, maybe it's evil the same as killing is evil, sometimes excusable-- But this is why I'm not a judge. [Among many other reasons.]
no subject
But I do think that mages of our school should be tasked with bringing in mages who have used their magic for ill after training with us.
And life is shades of grey. The law can dictate and try to make things black and white, but life never is clear the way the low wishes it to be. Two wrongs does not always make a right, but sometimes it does. Kill the bandit who is robbing and killing, mind control a slaver to free people, one is permanent, and both seem fair.
no subject
Two wrongs don't ever make a right, serah. If I kill a man in self-defense, he's dead beyond help and redeeming, condemned to wander the Void until he's penitent enough to embrace Andraste's mercy. [That's an interesting bit of theology right there, but--] And in that I wronged him, even if in doing so I prevented many greater wrongs he'd have committed.
Though that's a digression from the point. I'm not convinced that any use of blood magic to overthrow the minds of others is ever legitimate, but that's something to be decided much later, I imagine.
no subject
[Because that's especially interesting in light of Myrobalan's belief. It's not something he's encountered before.]
As far as Templars go, they get their abilities from lyrium, and that same lyrium is an addiction that is by all accounts nearly impossible to overcome. I do not see a reason to make more Templars as if we are scared of policing our own. Those who are already Templars, if they come with recommendations from several mages as someone who has not abused or taken advantage of, we could allow to serve out the rest of their time helping teach their non-lyrium skills to mages.
I feel that keeping them is simply too risky as well, as with mages in charge it could look like an army of swordsmen serving mages. And if they choose to try to take control we've the wolves penned with the... Mm. Wolves and sheep aren't exactly the right comparison, mages have magic, but there is something disconcerting about training people to defeat you, given them the means to strip you down, and keeping them on an addictive substance the whole time. Mages can learn Dispell; we don't need Smite thrown around.
As far as mages who do not train with us but choose to break the law... [He contemplates this for a moment.] I think we need a team of mages at the school that is prepared to go up against the unknown to bring them in. It would be irresponsible of us to say that we will only take care of mages gone wrong if they've been with us when we want Thedas to trust us to do right by them. We have to protect our vulnerable people, but we also have a duty to protect those who do not have magic from those who do.